![]() The Hunger Games' existence is horrible enough on its own for the people of Panem and those forced to compete. ![]() What really comes across here is the innate sadness of this scenario. Once more, we feel the bleakness of Panem and the sterile, manufactured happiness of the Capitol and those who inhabit it – Stanley Tucci is even more charismatically odious this time around as the ghoulishly energetic TV host, Caesar Flickerman. Meanwhile, I was pleased to see Lawrence does a wonderful job of maintaining the tone established by Ross in the first film and expanding upon it. Well, let’s get it out of the way – the shaky cam is pretty much non-existent in Catching Fire and Lawrence (Constantine, I Am Legend) films the action in a much more steady, traditional manner. I thought Gary Ross did a very good job on the first film, though I felt he did sometimes go too far with the shaky cam aesthetic, which some outright hated. The biggest change for Catching Fire from last time is the new director, Francis Lawrence. And in a game where there's almost no chance of surviving, Snow makes it clear to Heavensbee that Katniss Everdeen must not become a two-time winner. What does any good reality competition go with eventually? An All-Stars edition! And so Kantiss finds herself forced, once more, as part of the special "Quarter Quell", to compete in 75th annual Hunger Games, this time against 23 other survivors. And so Snow and his new head gamemaker, the ambitious Plutarch Heavensbee (the great Philip Seymour Hoffman), decide to deal with the problem in a big, public way. But Katniss has become a symbol to the people of Panem of something more – a spark of rebellion in a society that is quite the powder keg.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |